“Psychological Labels: Read Carefully Before Applying” Comments, Page 1

Just click to return to the article “Psychological Labels: Read Carefully Before Applying”.

3 Comments on “Psychological Labels: Read Carefully Before Applying”

  1. I have really enjoyed this article. My first attention was drow to the marital statement for better ‘or’ for worse. I have a simular affective reaction to ‘2 become 1’ it in no way differentiates you from the other… I much rather see the ying and yang symbol of together yet apart, some boundries harder than others always fluent..
    I understood the first section about how people with the label narcicism, really just crave for love and attention and validation like any other person we try to support.
    The manipulation example was another strike, where is that line, the differents between creating what you want in a win win situation…, or do we label it manipulation.
    I today assisted in a circle talk with +- 15 year old girls about bullying..
    gossip was a big aspect that surfaced in the discussion.. And than i wondered where is the line between, communicating, sharing information to resolve issues. Especially us girls we talk to resolute, we love it.!. Then when big high school issues arrive, we shouldn’t discuss it.. It is secret.. it is gossip..
    The great thing was that we came to explore the label and the function and left with food for thought about the difference between talking to others to inflict pain on another or with the function of resolving issues, sharing.. It is Great and needed to communicate and state your view with the right intention..

    I can also see however how convienient it is to have general titles of symptoms added to the personal profile and context of each individual..

    So thanks Gordon, it was a pleasure reading it :]

  2. I have personal experience with misdiagnosis or incomplete case pictures. I think one of the worse diagnosis is Facticious Disorder and Malingering, of the later being a clinical opinion only briefly stated in the DSM and not an offical diagnois. This is besides the fact that FD is a clinical judgment of the conscience.

    The second worst diagnosis is Bodily Distress Syndrome of which psychosomatic/somatisization/somataform family of disorders accounts for another difficult are to differentiate from real medical disorders and real psychiatric disorders.

    I agree that their is a tight connection between mind, body and the gut. Their has even been a book published called Psychology for Medicine (for resident or practicing MD’s) to assit in real-life scenarios of psychosomaticism.

    But where is that dividing line and threshold?

    If psychologists and psychiatrists have these complex gray areas to navigate, thresholds of disorders to identify, and complex inter-relating, connected, common-sharing phenotypes, we can easily see the DSM is in serious need of more than what the DSM-5 has. Although it’s a step in the right direction with severity scales within spectrums.

    What’s the solution…?

  3. Not all behaviors are not a mental disorders they have issues in the past that cause physiological issues. Unless your born with a disorder its wrong to label a person with one without a full understanding how or why they act or behave in the manner. I not saying all therpist do this but its wrong and disrespectful to do this. I read lots of psychology books to have a better understanding of this. The human mind is interesting but can be confusing at times.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
 characters available

In accordance with our Privacy Policy, your email address will not be published with your comment or shared in any other way. Please do not SPAM. Comments which solicit personal advice, are rude or inflammatory, are not about this specific post, or are otherwise not in keeping with our Terms of Use may be deleted at our discretion. If you would like to make a comment or ask a question about something other than the subject matter of this post, please do get in touch directly.

Overseen by an international advisory board of distinguished academic faculty and mental health professionals with decades of clinical and research experience in the US, UK and Europe, CounsellingResource.com provides peer-reviewed mental health information you can trust. Our material is not intended as a substitute for direct consultation with a qualified mental health professional. CounsellingResource.com is accredited by the Health on the Net Foundation.

Copyright © 2002-2020. All Rights Reserved.