“You Don’t Have to Be an “Artist” to Be Creative” Comments, Page 1
Just click to return to the article “You Don’t Have to Be an “Artist” to Be Creative”.
One Comment on “You Don’t Have to Be an “Artist” to Be Creative”
Leave a Reply
In accordance with our Privacy Policy, your email address will not be published with your comment or shared in any other way. Please do not SPAM. Comments which solicit personal advice, are rude or inflammatory, are not about this specific post, or are otherwise not in keeping with our Terms of Use may be deleted at our discretion. If you would like to make a comment or ask a question about something other than the subject matter of this post, please do get in touch directly.
I was in London recently and saw the exhibition at the Royal Academy of works by Anish Kapoor,one of the most compelling arguements that you only need to know how to see to be creative.
Enormous red wax blacks the size of a small house moved gently on tracks while it forms and shapes as it goes along.
In other areas a cannon fire’s a wax ball against a wall,dripping and craeting as it does.
I am often accused of limiting my choice by art by the amount of effort that appears to have been used but here was an example of wax being creativly used……………..so get out the candles but first have a look at his work,its really quite remarkable,apart from the scale its the way we are forced to see.
As they say “learn to look to see”
lee du ploy