Research and Clinical Trials on Alprazolam (Xanax)

avatar image

This list of current clinical research trials on Alprazolam (Xanax) is followed by a short set of abstracts from the most recent research articles published on the drug.

Alprazolam (Xanax) Clinical Research Trials

From our searchable database at ClinicalTrialsFeeds.org, this list includes all the latest information about clinical trials involving Alprazolam (Xanax).

 

Get These Clinical Trials as a Newsfeed

Alprazolam:     Get the Alprazolam clinical trials feed.    Add the Alprazolam clinical trials feed to your My Yahoo! page.    Add the Alprazolam clinical trials feed to your MyMSN page.

Current Research Literature on Alprazolam (Xanax)

Here are abstracts for some of the latest research articles to have appeared on Alprazolam (Xanax):

The effects of alprazolam on tinnitus: a cross-over randomized clinical trial.

Med Sci Monit. 2009 Nov; 15(11): PI55-60
Jalali MM, Kousha A, Naghavi SE, Soleimani R, Banan R
BACKGROUND: Tinnitus remains a phenomenon with an unknown pathophysiology and for which few therapeutic measures are available. To date there has been insufficient evidence to support the use of alprazolam in the treatment of tinnitus. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of alprazolam for relief of tinnitus. MATERIAL/METHODS: Thirty-six tinnitus sufferers participated in this cross-over, randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Inclusion criteria included patients between ages 21 and 65, with a complaint of non-pulsatile tinnitus of more than 1 year duration. Patients with depressive or anxiety disorders were excluded, as were those using hearing aids. Participants received alprazolam 1.5 mg daily versus placebo in each period. Primary outcome variables included the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and tinnitus loudness. RESULTS: Thirty patients completed the study. The average age of patients was 47.58+/-7.65 years. Alprazolam in comparison with placebo did not result in statistically significantly greater relief in THI score and tinnitus loudness. There was a significant improvement in VAS score in the alprazolam group compared with the placebo group (p

The cannabinoid CB1 receptor is involved in the anxiolytic, sedative and amnesic actions of benzodiazepines.

J Psychopharmacol. 2009 Oct 13;
García-Gutiérrez MS, Manzanares J
Previous studies in our laboratory showed that cannabinoid CB1 receptor knockout mice (CB1-/-) presented increased anxiety-like behaviours that did not respond to the anxiolytic actions of benzodiazepines. These results suggest that the pharmacological effects of benzodiazepines may involve the participation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of alprazolam and the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 on behavioural assays (light-dark box test, neurological severity score and step-down inhibitory avoidance test) and on the functional activity of the CB1 receptor (WIN-55,212-stimulated [(35)S] guanosine triphosphate (GTP) gamma binding autoradiography).The administration of alprazolam (40 microg/kg, intraperitoneal (i.p.)) decreased anxiety-like behaviours in the light-dark box test and significantly reduced WIN-55,212-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgamma binding autoradiography in the amygdala and in the CA1 field of the hippocampus, but was without effects on CA2, CA3 and the dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus. The administration of AM251 (3 mg/kg, i.p.) blocked the anxiolytic action of alprazolam (40 microg/kg, i.p.), significantly reduced the sedative (ataxia, neurological severity score in the 0.5 cm bar) and the amnesic actions (short time term memory (1 h after electric shock)) of alprazolam (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.).Taken together, these findings revealed that cannabinoid CB1 receptor plays a pivotal role in the pharmacological actions of benzodiazepines. Furthermore, these results suggest that blockade of cannabinoid CB1 receptors may be useful in the treatment of patients with problems related to the consumption of benzodiazepines. Further clinical trials are needed to test this hypothesis.

Predictive Risk Factors for Pain During Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy.

J Endourol. 2009 Oct 12;
Vergnolles M, Wallerand H, Gadrat F, Maurice-Tison S, Deti E, Ballanger P, Ferriere JM, Robert G
Abstract Purpose: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is a noninvasive but painful procedure. The aim of this study was to identify predictive risk factors for pain during SWL. Patients and Methods: Two hundred twenty-two SWL treatments with the Lithostar lithotripter (Siemens) were included in a monocentric study. Patient and stone characteristics were prospectively collected in a database, and a standardized pain control protocol was administered 1 hour before treatment: paracetamol, nefopam, ketoprofen, and alprazolam. Subjective pain level was assessed with visual analog scale (VAS, 0-10). If VAS was >/=3, tramadol was added. If VAS was still >/=3, shockwave intensity was decreased or treatment was interrupted. The efficacy on stone fragmentation was evaluated 1 month after treatment. The need for adjuvant analgesia was compared with patient and stone characteristics to find out predictive risk factors for pain. Results: The average subjective pain was 3.1. The need for supplementary analgesia was more frequent in women (p = 0.035), younger patients (p < 0.001), anxious and depressed patients (p = 0.018), in patients with previous SWL (p = 0.0185), in patients with a rib projected stone (p < 0.001), in patients with renal stones (p = 0.0535), and finally in patients with homogeneous stones (p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed two independent risk factors for pain: young age (odds ratio = 5; p < 0.001) and rib projected stone (odds ratio = 5.23; p < 0.001). Stone fragmentation was worse in patients with an adjuvant analgesia requirement (p = 0.0311). Conclusion: Predictive risk factors for pain during SWL treatments were found: young age, rib projected stones, anxious and depressed patients, previous SWL treatment, and homogeneous stones. A higher analgesic requirement is necessary for these preselected patients to perform SWL and optimize its efficacy.

Benzodiazepines for delirium.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; CD006379
Lonergan E, Luxenberg J, Areosa Sastre A
BACKGROUND: Delirium occurs in 30% of hospitalised patients and is associated with prolonged hospital stay and increased morbidity and mortality. The results of uncontrolled studies have been unclear, with some suggesting that benzodiazepines may be useful in controlling non-alcohol related delirium. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and incidence of adverse effects of benzodiazapines in the treatment of non-alcohol withdrawal related delirium. SEARCH STRATEGY: The trials were identified from a search of the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group on 26 February 2008 using the search terms: (deliri* or confusion) and (benzo* or lorazepam," or "alprazolam" or "ativan" or diazepam or valium or chlordiazepam).The CDCIG Specialized Register contains records from major health databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, LILACS) as well as many ongoing trial databases and grey literature sources. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials had to be unconfounded, randomized and with concealed allocation of subjects. Additionally, selected trials had to have assessed patients pre- and post-treatment. Where crossover design was present, only data from the first part of the trial were to be examined. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers extracted data from included trials. Data were pooled where possible, and were to be analysed using appropriate statistical methods. Odd ratios or average differences were to be calculated. Only "intention to treat" data were to be included. MAIN RESULTS: Only one trial satisfying the selection criteria could be identified. In this trial, comparing the effect of the benzodiazepine, lorazepam, with dexmedetomidine, a selective alpha-2-adrenergic receptor agonist, on delirium among mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients, dexmedetomidine treatment was associated with an increased number of delirium- and coma-free days compared with lorazepam treated patients (dexmedetomidine patients, average seven days; lorazepam patients, average three days; P = 0.01). One partially controlled study showed no advantage of a benzodiazepine (alprazolam) compared with neuroleptics in treating agitation associated with delirium, and another partially controlled study showed decreased effectiveness of a benzodiazepine (lorazepam), and increased adverse effects, compared with neuroleptics (haloperidol, chlorpromazine) for the treatment of acute confusion. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: No adequately controlled trials could be found to support the use of benzodiazepines in the treatment of non-alcohol withdrawal related delirium among hospitalised patients, and at this time benzodiazepines cannot be recommended for the control of this condition. Because of the scarcity of trials with randomization of patients, placebo control, and adequate concealment of allocation of subjects, it is clear that further research is required to determine the role of benzodiazepines in the treatment of non-alcohol withdrawal related delirium.

Comparative efficacy of pregabalin and benzodiazepines in treating the psychic and somatic symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder.

Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009 Sep 9; 1-13
Lydiard RB, Rickels K, Herman B, Feltner DE
Prior research suggests that SSRIs may have greater efficacy for psychic compared to somatic anxiety, while benzodiazepines show greater somatic efficacy. The goal of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of pregabalin (PGB) in treating psychic and somatic symptoms of anxiety. Data were combined from six short-term, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose trials of PGB in patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). The following PGB daily dose groups were studied: 150 mg (n=210), 300-450 mg (n=455), and 600 mg (n=406), benzodiazepines (6 mg/d lorazepam and 1.5 mg/d alprazolam, n=299), vs. placebo (n=484). Changes in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) psychic and somatic anxiety factors and individual items were analysed. Treatment with 300-600 mg PGB significantly improved both the HAMA psychic and somatic anxiety factors. In contrast, treatment with 150 mg PGB appeared to be less effective, achieving significance only on the psychic anxiety factor. PGB (300-450 mg) was associated with significant improvement on 13 out of 14 HAMA items, while treatment with 600 mg PGB was associated with significant improvement in 10 out of 14 HAMA items. Treatment with benzodiazepines was also associated with significant improvement in both psychic and somatic anxiety factors, with significant improvement occurring in 5 out of 14 HAMA items. The results of this pooled analysis indicate that both PGB and benzodiazepines had significant efficacy in treating both HAMA psychic and somatic anxiety. A dose-response effect was evident for PGB that reached a plateau at a dose of 300 mg/d.

 

This page was last reviewed by Dr Greg Mulhauser, Monday, 1 June 2009.

The URL of this page is:
http://counsellingresource.com/medications/trials-and-research/alprazolam-research.html