Psychology, Therapy and Mental Health Resources from the Team at CounsellingResource.com

Psychology, Philosophy & Real Life

Dr Greg Mulhauser, Managing Editor

Growing FBI Surveillance of Social Networking Sites

Watch what you say: it’s not just your friends listening, it’s the Feds. Are you sure all your Facebook friends are who you think they are?

Photo by FBI - http://fbi.gov
Photo by FBI - http://fbi.gov

Undercover US law enforcement agents are creating fake online identities to follow suspects and collect private information. That’s according to an internal Justice Department document obtained in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit brought by the civil liberties group Electronic Frontier Foundation in conjunction with the UC Berkeley Samuelson Clinic. You can read the Justice Department document Obtaining and Using Evidence from Social Networking Sites in full at the EFF site, where it was just published today, as well as see the latter’s summary of the issue. The EFF will be maintaining a set of related files as they become available in their Social Networking Monitoring section.

According to the document, the US Federal government is regularly monitoring Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn and Twitter. Bizarrely, both the US Marshalls and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives failed to come up with any response to the EFF’s FOIA lawsuit. According to the EFF, “Neither organization found any documents on social networking sites in response to EFF’s request suggesting they do not have any written policies or restrictions upon the use of these websites.”

I think the only thing worse than a Federal agency that knows it is conducting undercover surveillance on social media sites — and not telling anyone about it until forced to do so by the law — is a Federal agency that doesn’t actually have any idea what it’s doing with regard to surveillance of social media sites!

How about you? What do you think?

Should government agents pretend to be someone else in the name of collecting evidence? Does it bother you that this practice only came to light in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit? Are you sure all your Facebook friends are who they say they are? Yes, I guess my biases are showing through with all those ‘leading’ questions. I’m happy to be challenged: I appreciate that many folks are happy to sacrifice a significant degree of civil liberties in exchange for enhanced security. Is this what that is?

Let us know in the comments!

And don’t forget: although we recently poked fun at the psychology of social networking (see “Understanding the Psychology of Social Networking”), we’ve also recently joined the 400 million other Facebook users out there, so you can now get our updates via Facebook.

5 Responses (2 Discussion Threads) to “Growing FBI Surveillance of Social Networking Sites”

  1. 1

    I would think this would fall under the categories of both entrapment and invasion of privacy. I can’t believe this and NO I am not happy to sacrifice a significant degree of civil liberties in exchange for enhanced security.

    • 1.1

      Me neither — and the events of 9/11 didn’t change my mind about that, although I know they did for many people.

      As an aside: isn’t it ironic that as I write at this moment, this article about government surveillance of social networking sites hasn’t yet been posted by anyone on social networking site par excellence, Twitter?

      All the best,
      Greg

  2. 2

    scary stuff, thanks for posting it, Greg. Scary and unacceptable, in my opinion. I do think it strange that this hasn’t been tweeted yet… maybe the community is somewhat in denial that this is going on? Which is another scary thing….

    • 2.1

      Still no tweets! It’s amazing. I would tweet it myself, but I don’t want to go anywhere near Twitter for my own sanity (some semblance of my ability to concentrate and prioritise does remain…)

  3. avatar image
    Dennis
    3

    They may use fake name to gather evidence, but not someone’s real name and information. People still need privacy.

The comment form is currently closed.