Technology, Experience and Our Current Situation: How Our Social Situation Affects Us
When we can do pretty much whatever we want, and have a variety of ways to do it, the question becomes what we want to do. The focus shifts to values.
We live our lives responding to the situation we are in. Our situations are complicated and have many aspects — including physical, emotional, mental, spiritual and social aspects.
We adjust to physical matters, such as how close someone is standing to us or how much oxygen is in a room; we respond emotionally to what others are saying; we use our intellect to make plans and reflect on our experience; we may have a sense of spirit or purpose or sense a lack of meaning, and we negotiate our relationships with those around us. We are continually engaging with these aspects of our lives.
Our psychology is affected by the world around us.
We also carry the past with us. We not only adjust to the world around us; we are also influenced by what we have learned and our past experiences. We often carry around with us (at least a part of) the world we grew up in. Often our early caregivers remain influential throughout our lives. In psychotherapy, the attention is usually on past trauma. This can lead to the past being seen as a bad thing. However, it also contains many resources that we draw on to respond in the present: language and other social rituals we have learned, ways of understanding, skills, friendships and much more.
Our response to the present can also be affected by our concerns, worries and plans for the future.
Our personal past and individual notions about the future mean that one person’s response in the present is likely to be different to another person’s response — even if they are responding to something reasonably simple like the enquiry, “Hi, how are you?”
In psychotherapy (and blogging) the focus is usually on the individual and what they can do. For this post, I’d like to look at the other end of the individual-social polarity and focus on our social situation.
This social world affects us. It seems likely that more people are more worried about money now than 12-18 months ago. It wouldn’t be surprising if psychotherapists are dealing with more anxiety now than 12-18 months ago.
These social changes are relatively short term. There is also longer term social change — measured in decades and centuries. One commonly cited example is: Where have all those hysterical Victorian upper class women that Freud used to treat gone to? (Are shock-jocks and some kinds of politicians in the same situation as Victorian upper class women? They seem hysterical to me.)
I’d like to spend the rest of this post giving my perceptions of how our current social situation is distinctive and the impact this is likely to have on our experience.
The Big Picture: Technology
For me the best characterisation of our society is Jacques Ellul’s The Technological Society [Amazon-US | Amazon-UK]. (Also see the International Jacques Ellul Society.) When we look at our society, and compare it to previous ages, it is striking how much technology there is. There are now lots of ways to do almost anything that we want to do. One example: if I wish to get physically fit, there are gyms, running clubs, jogging clubs, different styles of routines (like Pilates), martial arts, yoga or tai chi. I live in a relatively small city (less than half a million people) and here there are even options for what style of tai chi I would like to pursue.
The technological society consists not only of methods and software but of ways of thinking and feeling too. We can approach our lives as a series of problems or situations that are to be fixed or manipulated.
The Smaller Picture: Computers
One impact of computers is on the availability of information. Being able to google your question to find an answer — to just about any question — is quite different to needing to get to a library. Having information presented in answer to your question is different to needing to read a book and process the information (possibly presented in a quite different form) to get an answer to your question.
The second impact of computers is communication. We can be in communication with many people, widely dispersed in a variety of ways. The time taken to have pen-friend relationships is quite different to being on Facebook, phoning on your mobile, and sending email. We can be ‘in touch’ with people from most places on Earth at any time we like.
Implications
Implications of Technology
When we can do pretty much whatever we want, and have a variety of ways to do it, the question becomes what we want to do. The focus shifts to values. As individuals we are confronted with a ‘choice of values’ or even the need to create them. This is quite different to a sense of vocation — a calling has a sense of inevitability, of ‘choosing to become who we are’. We need processes where people can discover their values and gain the support they need to live in accord with them.
Implications of Information Overload
We need to become much better at how to process information so that it is useful to us — and not just ‘facts’ that we memorise (or more likely google and forget quite soon). “Data is not information, information is not knowledge, knowledge is not wisdom.”
Implications of Communication
Information is only a small part of human communication. The focus on information means that we neglect our emotions, our aesthetic sense and the time it takes to build a genuinely warm and human relationship. We need to know how to communicate with others (especially those who are not part of our sub-culture or tribe).
I’d like to hear about your experience. How do you experience your social situation and how do you respond to it? Do you think we need new kinds of counselling to respond to our different social situation?
Find Additional Information
Learn more with a Google search specifically on the ‘Jacques Ellul’ site:
Other articles by Evan Hadkins
This article was last reviewed by Dr Greg Mulhauser, Managing Editor on Tuesday, 7th April 2009. You can leave a reply below.
The URL of this page is:
http://counsellingresource.com/features/2009/04/07/technology-experience-and-our-current-situation/
47 Responses (Including 12 Discussion Threads) to “Technology, Experience and Our Current Situation”
-
Lunna12
I consider myself an introverted and yes, shy person. Many (and believed me)mmmmany different experiences (good and bad) have shaped the way I am today (and I am not better or worst than anybody). I can relate to what you say Tyron 100%. I think that sometimes people are afraid of what is “not familiarâ€, and sometimes happens that people live (in many cases) so selfishly that forget to smile and to just be polite. I am not different from other people that consider themselves from diverse ethnic background; I am a Latina from the Caribbean, my skin color is “whiteâ€, but I have other body features that show that I have African heritage. I am proud of my heritage, but I think other people may don’t want to look to their roots b/c that may be threatening to them. For example, I have a friend from South America living in the US that she wants so badly to be accepted by others that she starves to be fit and to look like the stereotype of the “American womanâ€. Needless to say she is always sick and has other emotional issues. In my experience, there are some people that as soon as they listens my accent try to disengage from the verbal contact, which to me is their loss. But overall, not everybody is like that and actually in my opinion they are a minority. Good thing!
-
12.2
I feel what you’re saying to, Lunna. As far as your friend goes, I know exactly what you are talking about, i see females trying so hard to look like a celebrity all the time.
Mixing in what you’re talking about Evan, with ladies trying to be more and more attractive, i feel that they are doing it so they can get one of those celebrity like guys. I’m not one of those guys, which makes me feel like that puts near the bottom of the list, which in response to that feeling I try to work out and beef up because that seems to be what women want nowadays.
-
12.4
its funny that you speak of vulnerability. I’ve been single for a while, trying to figure out what i want in a lady. I would like to see myself as more of a listener than a talker, and because of that, I’ve been thinking lately like I would want someone to be my listener. I go through things like everyone else, but the people around me don’t seem interested in the stories i want to tell or things what I want to discuss. I think being able to tell someone of myself would be a vulnerability in my case.
-
12.5
Hola Lunna,
Sorry to hear about your friend’s lack of self-acceptance. Sometimes I wish people could just be able to be themselves, it’s so much relaxing, reassuring, worthy and pleasant, among other things.
You hit the nail on the head, I bet she sure does have some emotional issues if she keeps trying to fit into a different society’s expectations. I wish she could accept herself more the way she is. If she did so, at least she would be able to live in peace with herself.
-
-
13
Hey Evan,
You know how you said to let you know if i thought of a topic? I was wondering if you would write something on rejection.
-
Lunna14
Hi Evan,
I would like to read something about habit. You know when a couple is breaking up, how to overcome the habit of not calling, or not seeing the other person, which to me may feel like comming out of a bad addiction. Thanks.
-
15
I’m a bit lost with the threads now… Regarding Evan’s comment that says “I’m wondering if people who feel shy or uncomfortable talking about their feelings face to face are more likely to go online (the kind of anonymity gives them a space to go deeper and more personal than they would face to face),” one of the first things that came to my mind was a play written by TS Elliot called The Cocktail Party where people feel more comfortable talking to a stranger (pouring their hearts and deepest secrets on someone they don’t know.) It’s like going to confession, where you don’t see the priest’s face. Some people might, in fact, feel intimidated either by the other person’s facial expressions or by their own inner fears of how others may react to what they have to say (confess, reveal, etc.)
So, I agree that maybe some people feel more comfortable communicating on line or any other venue that’s not face to face. Imagine someone who has some kind of social phobia and hates discussing his matters face to face… on-line therapy could be a good option for that person, for instance.
-
William Gordon16
The other type of ‘anonymity’ – similar to ‘The Cocktail Party’ – but without the ‘faceless’/'no body’ aspect of the RC Confessional (apparently Irish Parish priests know all their ‘cofessees(?)’ so this is a facade), is the conversation struck up with a complete stranger on a long distance train/coach journey where one knows the probability of meeting the person again is remote – which provides the opportunity to ‘open up’/reveal things to ‘bounce off’ each other and obtain opinions/ideas etc. I’ve used this on a number of occasions to advantage. There’s no ‘committment’ no ‘professional’ aspect as in the counselling situation – just a fellow human. The pen friend is similar. You both know that at any point either can say “Well, nice meeting you, but this is where I get off” – but during that time (which can be many years)it’s been a valuable, anonymous exchange of communication,feelings, emotions etc.The difference? Well, of course the letters themselves are still there with their personal ‘imprint’. The stranger on the train/coach has gone in a flash, forever (like the cyber correspondent with the delete key.)The (Cocktail) Party’s over – and all that’s left for the repentful penitant is the forgiveness and the ‘Hail Marys.’I guesss at the end of the day it depends on just what the individual is actually seeking – advice? help? sympathy? or simply some form of social interaction with no commitments and/or motives etc.It’s the ‘human touch’ I think that counts!
-
16.1
Hi William,
I agree with you. Also, it could well be just the need to be listened to/at.
I do a lot of talking to myself (thinking in a loud voice) and I’m not crazy. This is when I need to organize my ideas when I’m working on a new project, for instance. But, you bet, some of my neighbors think I’ve lost it.
But, I have this close relative of mine, who might call me several times a day to say nothing at all. All this person needs is someone who’d listen to her.
And this talking to a stranger thing might also be some kind of self-analysis, and instead of just talking to ourselves, we talk to somebody else.
I’m not sure about the Irish priests and the people they confess because I know very little about religion, so I can’t tell if they know the people or not.
But, maybe it’s not a bad idea talking to a stranger, depending on the context. In my country, for example, you wouldn’t even think of talking to a stranger, or someone you hardly know, due to the high level of crime. You never know who might take advantage of the information you give them. This does sound crazy and, indeed, it’s like a generalize feeling of paranoia, but unfortunately that’s the way things are here, right now.
Now, many years ago, people would talk and share their little secrets or personal feelings with people they had never met before. I think we -human beings- have a need to communicate with others, and I guess we just use the means we feel more comfortable with.
-
-
William Gordon17
-’The implications of Technology/The implications of Communication’-Well, the technology certainly improves the safety aspect, compared to talking to strangers on coaches and trains’ (although victims of hackers might dispute that!)Is it a form of self-analysis? I guess that depends on the level of communication! (could be just a variation of you talking to yourself, ‘disguised’ as project research! Do you LISTEN to yourself – or just ‘make a noise’?)As a writer I sometimes read aloud things I’ve just written – to ‘hear how they sound’, sometimes recording this. Am I ‘having a conversation with myself’ – like those lengthy ‘one-way’ phone calls from a lonely relative/friend? I try to convince myself they’re not of course. In both cases it’s the absence of the actual other person – whether ‘real’ or ‘imaginary’. But write your ideas /plot etc and send them to a friend/colleague etc. then it’s a totally differant ball game -It’s the personal touch! Sometimes as children we invent an imaninary friend. Sometimes ’sane’adults we talk to our cat or dog – often when there’s noone else around to talk to! I believe most of us are suffering from a poverty of isolation from our fellow human beings -largely due to ‘technology’.Just forty or fifty years ago we’d walk across the road or next door to have a chat with our neighbours.Now we’ll pick up the phone,text or email them. It’s quicker, easier – but makes us in reality more remote. Today I wish you a happy Easter, but what I’d REALLY like to do would be to pick a fresh daffodil from my garden, put it in an envelope and post it to you.After many weeks it would arrive, dried and shrivelled – but it would still be the same flowerI picked as you take it from the envelope, holding within it the same thoughts. This is much quicker – sent by a flick of my thumb across cyberspace – but honestly, hand on heart, which is best?
-
17.1
Which is best? I personally believe it depends on who determines what is best. Maybe I am wrong, who knows.
To me, every person is entitled to their own views. I may agree or not agree with them, but sure I respect other people’s views. I have my views (and I honestly think I am entitled to have them,) but I wouldn’t dare say they are better or worse than other people’s views.
Who am I to determine what is better or worse? I’m not God or anything like that. I’m not the judge of what is better or worse, at least in this context. I’m not the owner of the absolute truth.
I’m just a plain mortal with my personal views that some people may share or not. Some may respect my views or not, some may understand they are just different, not better or worse, and maybe some people do not understand or accept that…
But, what people choose to do (respect, accept, disagree, share, judge, condemn, etc.) is pretty far beyond my control.
Hence, I just live and let live. I can express my views, and if I am lucky, those who disagree will respect the fact that I have different views and that I am entitled to have my own views, without judging whether I am “right” or “wrong.”
I honestly believe it’s really nice when people can choose freely (and without being harshly criticized) what means of communication they prefer.
And, yes, I am very lucky that I actually do listen to myself. Thanks for your sharing thoughts.
-

« Older Comments