<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Irrelevant, External, and &#8220;Hard-Luck&#8221; Thinking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://counsellingresource.com/features/2009/01/08/irrelevant-external-and-hard-luck-thinking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://counsellingresource.com/features/2009/01/08/irrelevant-external-and-hard-luck-thinking/</link>
	<description>Looking at life through the prism of psychology, philosophy, mental health and more. Originally created by counsellor, psychotherapist and philosopher Dr Greg Mulhauser, this blog is now the work of an international team of contributors.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:49:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dr George Simon, PhD</title>
		<link>http://counsellingresource.com/features/2009/01/08/irrelevant-external-and-hard-luck-thinking/#comment-48504</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr George Simon, PhD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://counsellingresource.com/features/?p=1015#comment-48504</guid>
		<description>Good question, Karen.  Your comments indicate you already have good insight into this kind of situation.  

Sometimes, remaining silent appears like passive acquiescence or even endorsement.  But sometimes it&#039;s the best way to not reinforce.  One way to counter the tendency to incessantly attend to the irrelevant until you capitulate is to deliberately mention a time or two when the person exhibited full accountability and attention to the relevant without going off on tangents and indicate how much respect and admiration you had for that.  That puts the person in a bind whereby they can either choose keep focusing on the irrelevant and secure no reinforcement or change their tact and secure some positive regard.  

The most important thing to remember about any of these erroneous thinking patterns is that as long as they are present, there is a high likelihood that the maladaptive behavior such thinking spawned will occur again in the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question, Karen.  Your comments indicate you already have good insight into this kind of situation.  </p>
<p>Sometimes, remaining silent appears like passive acquiescence or even endorsement.  But sometimes it&#8217;s the best way to not reinforce.  One way to counter the tendency to incessantly attend to the irrelevant until you capitulate is to deliberately mention a time or two when the person exhibited full accountability and attention to the relevant without going off on tangents and indicate how much respect and admiration you had for that.  That puts the person in a bind whereby they can either choose keep focusing on the irrelevant and secure no reinforcement or change their tact and secure some positive regard.  </p>
<p>The most important thing to remember about any of these erroneous thinking patterns is that as long as they are present, there is a high likelihood that the maladaptive behavior such thinking spawned will occur again in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://counsellingresource.com/features/2009/01/08/irrelevant-external-and-hard-luck-thinking/#comment-48497</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://counsellingresource.com/features/?p=1015#comment-48497</guid>
		<description>So at the time you hear them complaining about the &quot;supposed&quot; lie the officer told in your example above, should you remind them of the greater picture?   Should you say a keyword such as watch the &quot;irrelevant details&quot;?  Of course you run the chance of them turning their criticism onto you at which point you should disengage?  We don&#039;t want to enable a lie but we don&#039;t want to get sucked into their reality either, like it is up to us to fix them.  I notice that if I do nothing but just listen it is like I am agreeing to the point he is making.  Then he later brings it up as fact over and over.  Although if I say I disagree, he will just say that he knows I disagree but he wants me to hear him over and over like one day I&#039;ll just wake up and know he has spoken truth for which my ears have been closed up to this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So at the time you hear them complaining about the &#8220;supposed&#8221; lie the officer told in your example above, should you remind them of the greater picture?   Should you say a keyword such as watch the &#8220;irrelevant details&#8221;?  Of course you run the chance of them turning their criticism onto you at which point you should disengage?  We don&#8217;t want to enable a lie but we don&#8217;t want to get sucked into their reality either, like it is up to us to fix them.  I notice that if I do nothing but just listen it is like I am agreeing to the point he is making.  Then he later brings it up as fact over and over.  Although if I say I disagree, he will just say that he knows I disagree but he wants me to hear him over and over like one day I&#8217;ll just wake up and know he has spoken truth for which my ears have been closed up to this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria</title>
		<link>http://counsellingresource.com/features/2009/01/08/irrelevant-external-and-hard-luck-thinking/#comment-48487</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://counsellingresource.com/features/?p=1015#comment-48487</guid>
		<description>*So* true!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*So* true!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

