What is a Character Disorder?
Personality and character disorders are not the same thing. Our personality defines the stylistic way we tend to interact, while our character is defined by the level of social conscientiousness and virtue in our personality. When personality or character traits present major obstacles to functioning in a healthy way, they might constitute a disorder.
First of all, having a disturbance (alt. “disorder”) of character is not the same as having a personality disorder, although many (including mental health professionals) erroneously use the terms synonymously. But before we can adequately explain what disturbances of character are all about, we have to define some terms.
The word ‘personality’ is derived from the Greek word persona, which means “mask.” In the ancient theater, males played all roles, including the roles of female characters. Also, the art of dramatizing situations and conveying emotion was not as evolved as it is today. So, actors used masks of various types to denote gender as well as to emphasize various emotional states. Classical theories of psychology borrowed the term “persona” because they conceptualized personality as the social “mask” a person unconsciously puts on to hide and protect the more authentic but more vulnerable “true self.” A more modern and perhaps more accurate definition of personality is the unique “style” of interaction with others and the world at large that a person adopts over time. Someone’s personality, therefore, is defined by the habitual ways they tend to see things and the relatively predictable ways they go about conducting their relationships. Their biological predispositions, temperament, and environmental factors, and predisposing mind-sets, all contribute to their unique style of interacting, which generally remains relatively unchanging across a wide variety of situations.
The word ‘character’ derives from both French and Greek words meaning to engrave or furrow a distinctive mark. The word has been used to denote the most distinguishing traits of an individual that define or “mark” them as a person. Most especially, the term has been used to reflect those aspects of an individual’s personality that indicate the degree to which his or her personality traits reflect socially desirable qualities such as self-control, ethics, loyalty, fortitude, etc. So, the term ‘character’ generally refers to the extent of one’s virtuousness and social conscientiousness.
All of us have different personality traits or attributes. It’s only when these traits cluster in both a manner and intensity that makes it difficult for a person to function adaptively that we consider designating them as having a personality disorder. Similarly, all of us have traits that reflect upon our character. When those traits cluster in both a manner and intensity that causes us to function in a licentious or socially irresponsible manner a good deal of the time, we say that someone might have a character disorder.
Some of the well-known personality types are best described as neurotic, at least to some degree. That is, their style of interacting with people is predominantly influenced by their fears, insecurities, and the defenses they mount to protect themselves from emotional pain. Traditional psychology is adequately suited not only to explain the inner workings of these personality types, but also to help such personalities deal with unresolved emotional issues.
Traditional psychology is poorly suited to explain the behavior of or to effectively treat individuals best described as character-disordered. In fact, holding onto some of the outdated notions traditional psychology promotes with regard to why people do the things they do and how to help them function in healthier ways are some of the main reasons people get victimized by disturbed characters and also why the disturbed characters rarely change for the better when others seek help for them. Disordered characters are very different from their neurotic counterparts on almost every dimension imaginable, and they require a whole different perspective to deal with them effectively. In coming posts, we’ll take a look at some of the major differences between neurotic personalities and disordered characters.
Do you suspect that someone you know has a character disorder? If so, you’ll want to keep up with the upcoming posts.
Other articles by Dr George Simon, PhD
This article was last reviewed by Dr Greg Mulhauser, Managing Editor on Wednesday, 10th September 2008. You can leave a reply below.
The URL of this page is:
http://counsellingresource.com/features/2008/09/10/what-is-a-character-disorder/

11th September 2008
I’m not sure I’m getting this…
What you are describing as character disordered individuals sounds like the personality disorders that fall under Cluster B. Should Cluster B then be separated from the other two clusters? (BTW, I’m not a professional, just an interested layperson.)
12th September 2008
So, the category is a value judgement?
Good people (ie. those in line with their societies norms) are not character disordered.
I take it that this includes Socrates, Jesus and Ghandi.
What is the defintion of virtue being used?
15th August 2009
Hi Evan,
I agree, the definition of a character-disorder as “licentious or socially irresponsible” behavior or non-conforming to societies norms, has its problems. For example, some cultures are oppressive or have oppressive components. Hence societies expectations are a non ideal reference point for civilized behavior. The reference point I use, is that the purpose of a moral code is:
1. Preservation of life.
2. Achievement of success.
I’ve read these two points in several books and believe the writers plundered the bible to get them. These two points were given in defense of healing on the sabbath
15th August 2009
Hi Ken,
I like that defination…but I guess to me when the reference to social norms was used it was in context to these two things probably being assumed…That character disordered people harm others frequently and have no conscience or virtue that helps them to overcome this and that is why they are so hard to treat.
1. Preservation of life.
2. Achievement of success.
I would add in to that in character disorders…it is in context to others success, for all concerned.
12th September 2008
[...] of traditional psychology to provide an accurate framework for understanding the phenomenon of character disturbance, as well as a post that clarifies the distinction betwen personality traits, personality disorders, [...]
12th September 2008
so is a character disorder more of a psychosis, whereas personality disorders are more of a neurosis?
2nd October 2008
Hello,
Personalities are superficial…. Though we all have them. And we love someone who seems happy and outgoing???
Character is deeper because it is about repition. And exhibited and attibuted to higher thought processes and is what you hone at for a lifetime as such emulate Jesus, Ghandi, and Socraties. Thanks Evan!
16th October 2009
Can’t help but comment here, Diane. The “superficial” character of personality applies well when we’re talking about neurosis. Neurotics put on a “social face.” For the non-neurotic, or for the character-disordered personality, however, what you see is what you get. Many a person has been done in by a disordered character because they “misread” their personality as a “front.” For a long time, many of us versed in traditional schools of thought have allowed ourselves to be overly influenced by neurotic metaphors.
Character is an aspect or dimension of personality. And, as you suggests, it “marks” a person with respect to integrity and commitment to living on a higher plane.