Provocative Therapy: Kill or Cure!
Provocative Therapy turns all accepted wisdom about therapy on its head. Here is a therapy in which the therapist makes fun of the client’s problems, blows them up out of all proportion and suggests crazy and surreal solutions seemingly off the top of their heads. So why does it seem to be effective?
Provocative Therapy turns all accepted wisdom about therapy on its head. Here is a therapy in which the therapist makes fun of the client’s problems, blows them up out of all proportion and suggests crazy and surreal solutions seemingly off the top of their heads. It is certainly all about thinking outside the box! It does seem however, when used as a conscious technique, which the client agrees to, to be pretty effective. How come?
The idea is that the therapist plays “devil’s advocate”, siding with the client’s “problem”, or rather with the part of them which is ambivalent about change, about fighting or letting go of the problem, in order to wake up the healthy part of the person. The British Provocative Therapy website presents case studies (although not, unfortunately, tapescripts!) involving clients with anxiety, panic attacks, and psychosomatic complaints, although it is hard to envisage how this method would help someone suffering from bereavement, say, and encouraging a suicidal client to go on and do it because they are useless does not seem the best idea either.
The idea is to call out certain dormant resources in the client. There are five of these: affirmation of self worth, appropriate self assertion, ability to realistically defend oneself, ability to perceive reality in a differentiated way rather than relying on global generalisations about the world, and ability to communicate affection and vulnerability in personal relationships. They are all about effective “functioning”, no more and no less. The therapist elicits these resources by the use of various strategies, with humour as the key.
I was actually motivated to look into provocative therapy at a client’s request. He was in search not of understanding or empathy, but of a great big kick so he could free himself from entrenched patterns, which he could see right through and was heartily sick of.
The approach is suggested to be particularly effective with “resistant” or “yes, but” clients, and recommended to therapists who cannot seem to “get the process moving”, who feel they are coming up against brick walls at every turn.
Provocative Therapy is the brainchild of Frank Farrelly, a therapist who worked with the founder of Person Centred Therapy, Carl Rogers, in the 1950s in an inpatient therapy programme and, unsatisfied with the results his clients were getting, started to develop a different approach, more in line with his own personality.
My first impression on reading a bit about the approach (I am no expert!) was that a form of brief therapy, looking for resources in the client rather than giving time and energy to the “problem”, is now rather a mainstream way of working, although it will take awhile for the stereotype of the navel-gazing patient lying on the couch for years on end “finding themselves” to dissipate.
The other thing that struck me was that the theoretical “contrast” between Farrelly and Rogers in the 1950s — one breaking the therapy “rules” or constraints, the other being totally self-effacing and waiting ad infinitum for the client to progress in their own way and at their own pace (even if they themselves are going absolutely crazy wanting to be helped to move forward) — no longer really holds, if it ever did.
Client-centred therapy has changed into Person centred therapy, based on the person of the client and also the person of the therapist, who within obvious ethical guidelines, is free to use his or her own self as genuinely as possible in the service of the client. Other therapeutic orientations too are moving more and more away from the idea of the therapist as a blank screen emitting predictable interventions and more towards individual, creative, and in a sense personal responses from therapists. I have often found myself laughing with clients and creating absurd metaphors and images, collaborating with various sides of them, giving them voices, names, making fun of the ones who are causing trouble. It happens naturally.
The sense of freedom can be intoxicating. As long as the relationship is collaborative (and provocative therapy from the outset selects a client group who specifically sign up for it) it can be a great feeling not to defer to those all-consuming problems, not to grant them the serious consideration they demand — not even to respect them! Why listen, after all, to that voice in your head that constantly tells you that you are worse than everyone else, or that you are going to pass out for no apparent reason, or that you can never be happy? The experience of being able to play around with the material in your life, in yourself, can be really empowering, and also dissolves the tension of having to think of the right solution. Maybe a totally crazy one will do instead! Maybe just moving your attention, feeling the tension dissolve, just the physical act of laughing with someone else, will break open that pattern.
This is my experience, referring to the theory I have read. The practice looks a little different — and I worry about the potential for a power differential and the consequences for the ego of the therapist. But frankly those things can go wrong in any form of therapy. At the end of the day the client knows, somewhere, if they can get to it, what they need. And while some need a holding space, others just need to drop that tension — they know in their heart of hearts that they could just stop it.
And so the case studies inform us that panic attacks can be solved by keeping a mop in your car (but only if you’re male and Scottish), that women with compulsive cleaning habits can find a more relaxed attitude to cleaning by being told how what a wonderful thing they are doing and how their job is after all to serve their husbands in every possible way, and that dreaming up ever more gross worst-case scenarios for people with IBS can remove their symptoms completely!
The jury is out…any comments?
Find Additional Information
Learn more with a Google search specifically on the ‘British Institute of Provocative Therapy’ site:
Related Posts
- Getting a Distance
- New Service at MyTherapist: Real Therapy, Online
- CBT More Effective than Light Therapy for Seasonal Affective Disorder
- MRI Predicts Success of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
- Online Treatment of Panic Disorder
Other articles by Sarah Luczaj
This article was last reviewed by on Monday, 7th April 2008. You can leave a response below.
The URL of this page is:
http://counsellingresource.com/features/2008/04/07/provocative-therapy-farrelly/


8th April 2008
Rogers has been unfairly caricatured. From the beginning he emphasised transparency by the therapist (not just agreeing with the client). It would be interesting to investigate this ‘forgetting’ by therapists. Perhaps they prefer hiding behind roles(?)
My worry about this kind of therapy (which is not so different to some parts of gestalt practised by Fritz Perls, who was a real p*&^k on occasion - though by no means always) is that it appeals to power freaks.
Victor Frankl has a theory that has a coherent place for humour.
Exaggeration is a part of lots of the person-centred therapies. It sounds like a one-trick process. And it chooses those who will be helped by this trick. Which is great.
As to the explanation. This seems circular. The person is helped by mobilising these resources, therefore the therapy evokes these resources. It doesn’t say how this is actually done. For this it would need to investigate perception and the way we make meaning.
8th April 2008
Thanks as ever for the thoughtful comment Evan (ever get the feeling we’re alone in a huge, draughty room?!)
I totally agree with your point re Perls and other therapists who sometimes, despite their insights, come across as showmen on a power trip.
I would also like some more explanation on how the resources are actually, speicifically evoked by this therapy. It didn’t seem actually to quite match up. This seems more of an extreme kind of zen therapy - more about just dropping the storyline.
9th April 2008
Yeah, I do get that feeling of aloneness. On the other hand lots of other people also note that the commenters are few compared with the number of readers.
I comfort myself with the numbers of readers and subscribers.
I wonder if the ratio of commenters to readers is the same as readers of newspapers to those who write letters and emails. It would be good to have some data.
9th April 2008
As a Farrelly approved Provocative Therapy Trainer and good friend of Frank, I have never heard of this approach “killing” anyone, although many have discovered immense benefits…
Before anyone “worries” about the potential implications of what they imagine PT could do, I suggest attending a live training, reading the original book and/or watching the released DVD material of this approach in action. Anyone studying PT would know it is TOTALLY different to Fritz’s work and any suggestions otherwise are quite ludicrous
I use Provocative Therapy alongside other approaches with literally hundreds of clients each year, many of which had previously attended years of CBT without success. Frank will be in the UK to present his work on Nov 1 & 2 (see http://www.tranceformingnlp.com)
REgards
Nick Kemp
Provocative Therapy & Provocative Change Works Trainer
9th April 2008
thanks for commenting, Nick!
My tongue was very firmly in my cheek when I wrote the title there ;-) didn’t mean to imply that this form of therapy is actually lethal!
Thanks for the info. As I stated (I hope clearly enough!) I really have the most superficial knowledge of the approach. I wasn’t meaning to introduce the approach on its own terms so much as to comment on how it sounds to me, from the outside, and the thoughts provoked, which are all mine.
I am interested in learning more and apologise to anyone who might feel a helpful approach has been unfairly caricatured.
9th April 2008
Hi Nick,
Good to hear from someone who uses this approach.
What are the differences you see to Fritz’s work?
9th April 2008
I have to rush to see clients, but check http://www.provocativetherapy.info to get a good insight into what Frank has created
9th April 2008
thanks Nick - funnily enough I’m just dashing off to see clients too! Will take a look when I get in.