The Ethics of Boosting Brainpower
Cognitive enhancements are on the scientific horizon — ways of making our brains function better. But they will only be available to those who are able to pay for them?
The BMA (British Medical Association) have issued a discussion paper about the ethics of the development and use of cognitive enhancements, interventions such as nutritional supplements, pharmaceuticals or implants which can improve mental functioning. It recognises that developments in medical interventions used for people with problems are likely to be seized upon by healthy people in order to “improve on nature”, either for themselves or their children, as a continuation of the tendency to improve their mental functioning through providing an environment conducive to learning.
It does seem, however, as if a certain barrier is crossed when we are talking about medical interventions. But that is not what I wanted to write about here. One of the arguments the BMA cites as a reason for caution is “interconnectedness”, the fact that a difference in cognitive functioning affects all other types of functioning, e.g. the emotional and creative, and also the fact that personal choices impact on society as a whole.
I would argue that it works the other way too: what society chooses to spend money on impacts on individuals. As far as society as a whole is concerned, the most basic ways of boosting brainpower — a good diet, a reasonably stress-free life, an intellectually stimulating environment — are by no means available to all.
There are plenty of studies showing a link between cognitive functioning and poverty which need to be seriously investigated. It may be the case that the cognitive functioning of society as a whole could be enhanced by spending the research and development money in quite a different way.
In fact it may be very difficult, morally, to justify the spending of vast sums of money to develop drugs and procedures for the very wealthiest of the world’s population to perfect themselves, rather than prioritising the fight against poverty. While there will always be richer and poorer people in any given society, when economic circumstances become a strong indicator of health and well being, it is clear that something is seriously wrong.
Find Additional Information
Learn more with a Google search specifically on the ‘British Medical Association’ site:
Rate this post?
(2 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ...Related Posts
- Practitioner Tools: Encryption Software in Mental Health Practice
- Online Therapist Avoids Censure Over Breach of Client Confidentiality
- The Toll of Subtle Racism
- MRI Predicts Success of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
- CBT Offers More Specific Treatment of OCD, Says Danish Study
Other articles by Sarah Luczaj
This article was last reviewed by on Wednesday, 28th November 2007. You can leave a response below.
The URL of this page is:
http://counsellingresource.com/features/2007/11/28/cognitive-enhancements-ethics/
30th November 2007
When I was in grade school I had problems with reading because everything was backwards and the counsular said that I probably could not learn and she did not have the knowlege to treat my problems. I went through school this was up to college. I just about failed high school because of it and then I decided to try for college and I had an instructor that knew my problems and sent me to the schools rehab person and I got my dislexia turned around and I maintain a B aberage thoughout my college years.
Conative disorders does not have to cost anything if you find a person that is willing to give of their time.
I am in the process of developing a rehav for stroke patients that have conitive problems and teach them how to reconize future signs of a stroke and start rehabing before the dorctor or emergency personnel gets to them.
I am a PhD with conitive disorder and I can teach these techizues to anyone who want to know.